Le 25/03/2019 à 14:38, Wayne Stambaugh a écrit : > I'm guessing drawing 45 degree lines in the new toolframe wouldn't be > too difficult to implement.
Be careful: Bus to bus entries are mainly for aesthetic purposes. However wire to bus entries are not equivalent to wires: they do not connect wires between them. Replacing them by wires can create (in some cases) unwanted connections. > > On 3/25/2019 9:29 AM, Jon Evans wrote: >> By the way, I think one reason people use these is because they want a >> 45-degree bus wire for aesthetic reasons. >> I think a better wire-placing tool in Eeschema is already on the roadmap >> -- if we can support 45-degree lines natively, it would meet that demand >> without a special type of object. >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:27 AM Jon Evans <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I'm okay with that if the rest of the core team is also :-) >> Sometimes you have to break workflows to move forward and make >> things easier for new users. >> >> On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:08 AM Wayne Stambaugh >> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> Jon, >> >> I don't have any issues with this although you may get some push >> back >> from some users who are resistant to change. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Wayne >> >> On 3/19/2019 9:37 PM, Jon Evans wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > One of the things I want to clean up in the UX after the bus / >> > connectivity upgrades I've done are merged is to remove >> Bus-Bus Entries >> > from the design toolset. >> > >> > Why? >> > >> > 1) They aren't actually useful or meaningful (they are just >> graphical at >> > this point). If you want to branch off bus wires from each >> other, just >> > use junctions like normal wires. >> > >> > 2) They are confusing. I've heard this from several users, >> because they >> > look and sound a lot like Bus-Wire Entries, which are useful. >> > >> > What about old designs? >> > >> > My proposal is to just remove the tools to allow placement of new >> > Bus-Bus Entries without removing the underlying code to handle >> them. >> > Existing designs would still load and render properly. >> > >> > In theory we could make some kind of migration to remove them and >> > replace with direct bus wire connections, but I'm not sure that's >> > necessary. >> > >> > As long as we do a good job of documenting the way to use >> busses under >> > the new system, and update the example schematics accordingly, >> I think >> > new users will be set on the right path. We could include a >> note about >> > this on the blog / forums to let existing users know (although >> from what >> > I can tell, only a small fraction of existing users use them >> in the >> > first place). >> > >> > Any concerns with this? >> > >> > Jon >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> > Post to : [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> Post to : [email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]> >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp > -- Jean-Pierre CHARRAS _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
