ma 8. heinäk. 2019 klo 19.04 Evan Shultz (evan.shu...@gmail.com) kirjoitti:
> Because of varying pad shapes, sometimes "+" spokes are best and other > times "x" may be preferred. So having a choice of those options, even > though both have the same number of thermal spokes, may be desirable. I > believe this is captured in the "initial angle" concept, but IMO having the > choice of "+", "x", "8 way", and "solid" is more obvious that picking an > initial angle. But perhaps I misunderstood. > What I have felt need for is automatically finding locations for spokes so that when a pad isn't fully surrounded by a zone it would still be connected with 4 (or as many as possible) spokes. Sometimes changing the direction between x and + would be enough, sometimes adding spokes from x to spokes of +. For example N(orth), NW, W, SW instead of just N and W. Because adding spokes is automatic anyways, exact positioning isn't important. There should be as much copper as possible (and preferably in many directions) while still having the thermal effect. Even the thicknesses of the individual spokes could be calculated automatically to meet the requirements. What counts is the total width of all the spokes together, or am I wrong? Eeli Kaikkonen
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers Post to : kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~kicad-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp