Well to explain in more detail I have an edge-pins part that I have created as 
a module. However, I used 2* 1x14 headers on the schematic. In Eagle cad I can 
simply draw in a ratsnest connector and bamn I am done no back annotation 
needed. At times its more of a hassle to go back and create another library 
element when all I am doing is hooking up a pin header to an line of edge pins. 


-B

--- In [email protected], Andy Eskelson <andyya...@...> wrote:
>
> 
> What do you mean by a ratsnest not connected to anything? If there is a
> line then it must be connected to something.
> 
> PCBNEW will NOT allow you to route a track if that routing clashes with
> the clearance of other tracks (I've fallen into that trap several times) 
> This gives the impression that PCBNEW will not allow a particular
> ratsnest line to be connected. 
> 
> If the ratsnest is connected to pins that
> you don't want connected at all, then place a NC (no connection)  marker
> on that device in eeschema 
> 
> 
> Andy
> 
> 
> On Sun, 12 Apr 2009 04:14:21 -0000
> "dioiioib" <dioii...@...> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > is there any way to connect the ratsnest in PCBNEW I have a .brd file that 
> > suddenly has traces that are not connected according to the 
> > ratsnest/netlist file, I wouldn't worry as much if I did not need a ground 
> > plane and power plane on the board. 
> > 
> > I am not apposed to connecting them manually if someone can give me insight 
> > into reading and modifying the netlist file manually.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > Please read the Kicad FAQ in the group files section before posting your 
> > question.
> > Please post your bug reports here. They will be picked up by the creator of 
> > Kicad.
> > Please visit http://www.kicadlib.org for details of how to contribute your 
> > symbols/modules to the kicad library.
> > For building Kicad from source and other development questions visit the 
> > kicad-devel group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kicad-develYahoo! Groups 
> > Links
> > 
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to