This is the same problem I had in a recent post.
The ERC sees a whole set of power pins as 'driven' (they need to have power 
supplied to them).  Then there must be a singular 'power' pin (I'm not sure how 
to specify it) that supplies power to the others.  Your error is saying that 
this single power output pin has not been declared.

I am loathe to permit any warnings in the ERC, but I have allowed this one for 
the time being.  It is a good idea to do error checking in the schematic, of 
course.  And even to check that inputs are driven by outputs.  I have just 
found the work to put this information into the schematic is not very 
productive.  I think this may be a result of many confusing circuit node 
characteristics when connectivity is characterized by a rule set.

So, I declared everything 'passive'.  Still running the ERC is very necessary.  
That's when I got this error 'GND is not driven'.  I could not find a work 
around that did not require placing info into the schematic about the 
directional characteristics of the power pin'

BTW - I do not use hidden power pins.  Why do it?  Those are very important to 
the circuit.  I just don't want them to be implicit or described in a reference 
table.  There might be some error between the reference table and the hidden 
power pin declarations that is not found untill the PCB prototype is powered up.

KiCAD is a great tool!

...Jim H.



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: josh_eeg 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 6:17 AM
  Subject: [kicad-users] A rule check issue that is confusing me. I have GND 
comming from a header


    
  A rule check issue that is confusing me. I have GND comming from a header. 
Their is the same GND in other places on the circuit.
  But I get a error like it should be driven. But that sounds like a short...
  ERC: Warning Pin Power_In not driven.
  I have GND hooked to a header... Now that same ground simbol is in the rest 
of my circuit. 
  Please help. 



  

Reply via email to