Sorry I can't help there, my windows box is XP pro and kicad is installed
on it, but I have no idea what version. It must be a year or two old by
now. 

I'm sure others are running onvista, so a few comments may appear.

Andy


On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 06:28:05 -0800 (PST)
yukku yukkoooooo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Well I am actually using Windows Vista.. maybe thats the problem... does 
> Kicad 16 Feb version work on Vista ?
> If it does not I also have a Windows ME machine .. let me know if I can 
> install on it.
> 
> Regards
> yukku
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: Andy Eskelson <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, December 31, 2009 7:27:57 PM
> Subject: Re: [kicad-users] Pcbnew crash while filling a zone
> 
>   
> Nothing wrong with it or your method at all, it fills perfectly, merging
> the ground tracks as you would expect.
> 
> Must be something odd about your install.
> 
> I use the linux kicad-2009-02- 16-final- CENTOS_4. 4.tgz archive, running it
> on a SUSE 11.1 install at the moment.
> 
> If you are running on windows, check your graphic card drivers and
> ensure that are up to date. Sometimes they can cause all sorts of odd
> effects and crashes. (I'm not referring to kicad here, but more
> generally) As a zone fill is very much an operation that the OS may use
> the graphic card functions to do, it's worth checking. It might even be
> worth turning off any high-end graphic card funbction to see if that
> gives you any clues.
> 
> Andy
> 
> On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 02:52:33 -0800 (PST)
> yukku yukkoooooo <yukku19752000@ yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andy and all,
> >  I followed the procedure given in the Pcbnew help .pdf file, and I still 
> > get a crash while trying to fill the Ground zone on a 2 layer board.
> > I am attaching the .brd file in this mail. It was saved just before 
> > attempting the refill. Can you open it and see what I have not done right ?
> > 
> > Sorry if this is some more newbie issues.
> > 
> > Thanks for the help
> > yukku
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
>  
> 
> 
>       

Reply via email to