KiCad-2009-02-16-final-WinXP_autoinstall this works just fine on Windows 7 (average spec laptop) though screen drawing is a bit slow, probably due to the graphics card in the laptop being a bit average rather than any problem in Windows 7 itself.
Nick. --- In [email protected], kajdas <kaj...@...> wrote: > > Yes, RC4-5 are development. > I use KiCad-2009-02-16-final and it is very stable but I do not use Win 7. > M. > > ---- Stanley_Allen <stanley_al...@...> wrote: > > ============= > I see on the download site http://iut-tice.ujf-grenoble.fr/cao/ the > following. Are the two versions RC4 (2/2010) and RC5 (2/2010) considered > Developmen Versions? Which do you consider the most stable version for > Windows 7? Should I use the 20/03/2009 version? Thanks! > > 20/03/2009 22:13 40697028 KiCad-2009-02-16-final-WinXP_autoinstall.zip > > 20/03/2009 11:29 95375540 > KiCad-2009-02-16-final-WinXP_full_with_components_doc_autoinstall.zip > > 21/02/2010 21:01 114339391 > KiCad-2010-02-17-RC4-WinXP_full_with_components_doc_autoinstall.zip > > 28/02/2010 21:00 114460347 > KiCad-2010-02-28-RC5-WinXP_full_with_components_doc_autoinstall.zip > > > --- In [email protected], kajdas <kajdas@> wrote: > > > > Use latest stable version. > > Development versions do not work reliably on Windows 7 yet. > > M. > > > > ---- Stanley Allen <stanley_allen@> wrote: > > > > ============= > > I have a pretty high end PC running Windows 7 with Intel Core 2 Quad, 6 GB > > of DDR2 RAM. > > > > Please let me know as a new user what version kicad I should download and > > why. I would rather have a more stable version but understand the newer > > versions might be worth trying. > > > > Do you recommend any particular download site? > > > > thanks, > > Stan > > >
