kajdas wrote: > ---- dickelbeck <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I strongly suggest using the latest RC (release candidate) for March 2010. >> There will never be a more stable version than this if people don't install >> it and say it is stable. When that happens, it will simply get renamed to >> "released", (not released in more stable form). >> > > > I totally agree but I would be careful to recommend it to all 'newbies' who > will get discouraged if something does not work and instead of reporting the > problem they will spread 'bad' publicity. > Martin >
OK, carefully then: use the latest RC from March 2010. If you have problems, you can: 1) ask for your money back. 2) see if you can install more than one version concurrently, and try either 3) report bugs as you find them. 4) hire a programmer to fix the problem should nobody move. We sure don't want to lose market share. Our bottom line would hurt. Dick
