--- In [email protected], "Anders Gustafsson" <anders.gustafs...@...> 
wrote:
>
> 1. Jumpers
> Agreed. I use oversized vias for that and although you can create a "wire" 
> component, such component should be stretchable in increments of 2,54mm to be 
> really useful

How about a zero ohm resistor, either surface mount, thru-hole
or 0.1x0.1xX headers?

> 
> 2. Abitrary pads
> I just place the component "1PIN" and make the size of the hole what I want. 
> works great. To place connected stuff that is not in the schematic/netlist, 
> you need to turn off DRC though.

Every pin, even test points should be referenced in a netlist
and/or a schematic to provide closure for a complete route.

Hard to beat working with a schematic created netlist to
drive a layout rat's nest...somebody has to veriry proper
operation of the board and a schematic would greatly help
that person.

> 
> 3. Trace width
> Yes, a dropdown of common widths would help to get a more consistent board.

What is standard? Seems to be more of a function of the
tolerance to what PCB manufactures can handle.  I think there
is a global set track width and a set track width per net
such as Power and ground.

> 
> - Anders Gustafsson
>   Engineer, CNE6, ASE
>   Pedago, The Aaland Islands (N60 E20)
>   www.pedago.fi
>   phone +358 18 12060
>   mobile +358 40506 7099
>   fax +358 18 14060
>  
> 
> 
> >>> "James" <jamesrsw...@...> 2010-04-09 23:39 >>>
> No easy way to designate jumpers for single sided boards. I've been using 
> enlarged vias but this is not ideal. It would be really great if I could just 
> plunk down a couple of standard pads of the desired size/shape and designate 
> them as connected. I've seen products that have a wire component that can be 
> used to connect between points.
> 
> Similarly, I can't just plunk down pads arbitrarily in the layout. I like to 
> use pads to designate mounting screw holes and such, or for test points, 
> flying leads, etc. It really ought to be possible to place pads without them 
> being part of a package.
> 
> Trace width selection is cumbersome, rather than a dropdown list of common 
> widths with the option to enter an arbitrary list, it seems one has to create 
> a list of trace sizes otherwise by default there is only one available, and 
> there is a limit of 7(?) custom sizes.
>


Reply via email to