Hello Fabian, The matter is being discussed at the moment. When we come out with a final statement I will inform you directly.
Thank you for your interest. All the best, Philip On 26 Mar 2012, at 1:51 PM, Fabian Cretton wrote: > Hello Philip, > > That helped a lot! > > Will the Linked Data Gazetteer really become available ? if yes, do you know > when ? > > Thanks again > Fabian > > >>> Philip Alexiev <philip.alex...@ontotext.com> 26.03.2012 11:50 >>> > Hello Fabian, > > This is the right place to ask questions related to the LKB gazetteer, as it > is developed by Ontotext. I will apply my answers inline - under your > questions. > > On 26 Mar 2012, at 9:18 AM, Fabian Cretton wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> I write to this list as this seems to be the place to ask questions about >> the large KB Gazetteer. This question is not directly related to KIM, thank >> you to redirect me to a more appropriate list if needed. >> >> I have only done little tests with the large KB Gazetteer in Gate (not with >> KIM), and there are a few things about which I couldn't find more >> information: >> - can the large KB Gazetteer use the output of a lemmatisation ? if not, is >> there so far no way to use Gate with a very large gazetteer, but doing >> lookups also on lemmas ? > > We have also met with this requirement. The LKB Gazetteer does not support > this functionality. Internally, we are using its successor - the Linked Data > Gazetteer (LD Gazetteer). Unfortunately it is still not publicly released. > >> - when the large KB Gazetteer is used with a traditional gate gazetteer (a >> .lst file), is it possible to add features to each entry in the list, as in >> the ANNIE gazetteer ? > > The LKB Gazetteer has the capability to only set class and instance features > of the annotations, in this way relating them to instances in the semantic > repository. Thus the name - semantic annotations. You can use JAPE rules, or > write your own resource to set the features you desire. If you provide some > more information about the scenario, we could perhaps help you more. > >> - I see a strange behaviour working with Gate 6.1, the large KB gazetteer, >> and connecting to an OWLIM 4.3 store: >> the initial SPARQL query gives: >> ** Loading completed: 2414240 aliases in 213 second(s). >> but when restarting the project: >> ** Aliases in IGNORE list:0 >> ** Loading of trusted entities from C:\Fab\Semantic >> Web\SoftCust\Ontology\gate_largeKB_remoteRep\kim.trusted.entities.cache >> ** 1662791 elements loaded. >> Is it normal those figures are not the same ? > > My opinion is that this is caused either by an ignore list (although the log > shows that this list is empty) or duplicate records. A bunch of identical > statements in the result will cause a single record in the dictionary to be > created. Try putting a "distinct" to your gazetteer query. > >> >> Thank you for any information >> Fabian >> _______________________________________________ >> Kim-discussion mailing list >> Kim-discussion@ontotext.com >> http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion > > Hope this helps, > Philip Alexiev > Software Engineer, KIM team > > _______________________________________________ > Kim-discussion mailing list > Kim-discussion@ontotext.com > http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
_______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
