Thank you to keep me informed, and thanks again for OntoText's wonderful job. Fabian
>>> Philip Alexiev <philip.alex...@ontotext.com> 28.03.2012 15:28 >>> Hello Fabian, The matter is being discussed at the moment. When we come out with a final statement I will inform you directly. Thank you for your interest. All the best, Philip On 26 Mar 2012, at 1:51 PM, Fabian Cretton wrote: Hello Philip, That helped a lot! Will the Linked Data Gazetteer really become available ? if yes, do you know when ? Thanks again Fabian >>> Philip Alexiev <philip.alex...@ontotext.com> 26.03.2012 11:50 >>> Hello Fabian, This is the right place to ask questions related to the LKB gazetteer, as it is developed by Ontotext. I will apply my answers inline - under your questions. On 26 Mar 2012, at 9:18 AM, Fabian Cretton wrote: Dear all, I write to this list as this seems to be the place to ask questions about the large KB Gazetteer. This question is not directly related to KIM, thank you to redirect me to a more appropriate list if needed. I have only done little tests with the large KB Gazetteer in Gate (not with KIM), and there are a few things about which I couldn't find more information: - can the large KB Gazetteer use the output of a lemmatisation ? if not, is there so far no way to use Gate with a very large gazetteer, but doing lookups also on lemmas ? We have also met with this requirement. The LKB Gazetteer does not support this functionality. Internally, we are using its successor - the Linked Data Gazetteer (LD Gazetteer). Unfortunately it is still not publicly released. - when the large KB Gazetteer is used with a traditional gate gazetteer (a .lst file), is it possible to add features to each entry in the list, as in the ANNIE gazetteer ? The LKB Gazetteer has the capability to only set class and instance features of the annotations, in this way relating them to instances in the semantic repository. Thus the name - semantic annotations. You can use JAPE rules, or write your own resource to set the features you desire. If you provide some more information about the scenario, we could perhaps help you more. - I see a strange behaviour working with Gate 6.1, the large KB gazetteer, and connecting to an OWLIM 4.3 store: the initial SPARQL query gives: ** Loading completed: 2414240 aliases in 213 second(s). but when restarting the project: ** Aliases in IGNORE list:0 ** Loading of trusted entities from C:\Fab\Semantic Web\SoftCust\Ontology\gate_largeKB_remoteRep\kim.trusted.entities.cache ** 1662791 elements loaded. Is it normal those figures are not the same ? My opinion is that this is caused either by an ignore list (although the log shows that this list is empty) or duplicate records. A bunch of identical statements in the result will cause a single record in the dictionary to be created. Try putting a "distinct" to your gazetteer query. Thank you for any information Fabian _______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion Hope this helps, Philip Alexiev Software Engineer, KIM team _______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
_______________________________________________ Kim-discussion mailing list Kim-discussion@ontotext.com http://ontomail.semdata.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kim-discussion
