More "fecal matter" being thrown up the air with the hoopla regarding OOXML's near-acceptance to ISO standardization. Allegations of undue process and corruption are surfacing. More links for you guys...
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070827111019189 http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070907-iso-reforms-proposed-in-response-to-ooxml-shenanigans.html I'm signing the petition... A "standard" that was made so through dubious means (corruption, bribery,vote-buying) is too repugnant for my taste. I urge the others to do the same and go sign the petition. On 10/22/07, aldiones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.noooxml.org/petition > > -- > Good design adds value faster than it adds cost. > _________________________________________________ > Kagay-Anon Linux Users' Group (KLUG) Mailing List > [email protected] (http://cdo.linux.org.ph) > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > -- "A dog that has no bite, barks loudest." Registered Linux User #400165 http://baudizm.blogsome.com Full-Disclosure,LARTC,Open-ITLUG, PRUG, KLUG, linuxusersgroup, sybase.public.ase.linux
_________________________________________________ Kagay-Anon Linux Users' Group (KLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (http://cdo.linux.org.ph) Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
