Another equally repugnant issue regarding OOXML at ISO: http://www.os2world.com/content/view/14868/1/
On 10/22/07, hard wyrd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > More "fecal matter" being thrown up the air with the hoopla regarding > OOXML's near-acceptance to ISO standardization. Allegations of undue process > and corruption are surfacing. More links for you guys... > > http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070827111019189 > > http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070907-iso-reforms-proposed-in-response-to-ooxml-shenanigans.html > > I'm signing the petition... A "standard" that was made so through dubious > means (corruption, bribery,vote-buying) is too repugnant for my taste. I > urge the others to do the same and go sign the petition. > > On 10/22/07, aldiones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://www.noooxml.org/petition > > > > -- > > Good design adds value faster than it adds cost. > > _________________________________________________ > > Kagay-Anon Linux Users' Group (KLUG) Mailing List > > [email protected] (http://cdo.linux.org.ph) > > Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph > > > > > > -- > "A dog that has no bite, barks loudest." > Registered Linux User #400165 > http://baudizm.blogsome.com > Full-Disclosure,LARTC,Open-ITLUG, PRUG, KLUG, linuxusersgroup, > sybase.public.ase.linux -- "A dog that has no bite, barks loudest." Registered Linux User #400165 http://baudizm.blogsome.com Full-Disclosure,LARTC,Open-ITLUG, PRUG, KLUG, linuxusersgroup, sybase.public.ase.linux
_________________________________________________ Kagay-Anon Linux Users' Group (KLUG) Mailing List [email protected] (http://cdo.linux.org.ph) Searchable Archives: http://archives.free.net.ph
