https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14930
--- Comment #8 from Marc Véron <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #7) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #6) > > Should not we take 0 into account? > > I agree. Allowing 0 would mean a patron must have no fines in order to renew > items. I think allowing 0 makes sense. It would also be good to note in the > system preference description that leaving it empty will disable the feature > ( i.e. patrons will always be able to renew items, no matter how much they > owe in fines ). ...and maybe the wording should reflect the >0 and 0 cases (with and without displaying the limit), and in a translatable way (sentence not split by tags). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
