https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14930

--- Comment #11 from Marc Véron <ve...@veron.ch> ---
(In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #10)
> (In reply to Marc Véron from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #7)
> > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #6)
> > > > Should not we take 0 into account?
> > > 
> > > I agree. Allowing 0 would mean a patron must have no fines in order to 
> > > renew
> > > items. I think allowing 0 makes sense. It would also be good to note in 
> > > the
> > > system preference description that leaving it empty will disable the 
> > > feature
> > > ( i.e. patrons will always be able to renew items, no matter how much they
> > > owe in fines ).
> > 
> > ...and maybe the wording should reflect the >0 and 0 cases (with and without
> > displaying the limit), and in a translatable way (sentence not split by
> > tags).
> 
> You mean the wording displayed to the patron, correct?

Yes, correct  :-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to