https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14930
--- Comment #11 from Marc Véron <ve...@veron.ch> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #10) > (In reply to Marc Véron from comment #8) > > (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #7) > > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #6) > > > > Should not we take 0 into account? > > > > > > I agree. Allowing 0 would mean a patron must have no fines in order to > > > renew > > > items. I think allowing 0 makes sense. It would also be good to note in > > > the > > > system preference description that leaving it empty will disable the > > > feature > > > ( i.e. patrons will always be able to renew items, no matter how much they > > > owe in fines ). > > > > ...and maybe the wording should reflect the >0 and 0 cases (with and without > > displaying the limit), and in a translatable way (sentence not split by > > tags). > > You mean the wording displayed to the patron, correct? Yes, correct :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/