https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14695
Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Signed Off --- Comment #155 from Kyle M Hall <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benjamin Daeuber from comment #152) > (In reply to Benjamin Daeuber from comment #151) > > > I had not considered that a bug. If you do let me know and I'll change > > > that > > > behavior. > > > > If I allow item > > level holds for certain item types and then have a global preference > > override that, it may be a problem. > > If I *disallowed* item level holds for a certain item type that should say. So, what I had forgotten and had to remind myself was those rules are not meant for the staff side, only for the opac. It has nothing to do with this enhancement. However, I've added a small followup that lets the librarian know if a given item on a record would be forced to be an item level hold or would be disallowed as an item level hold! It seems like a good datum for the librarian to know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
