https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=14695
--- Comment #156 from Benjamin Daeuber <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #155) > (In reply to Benjamin Daeuber from comment #152) > > (In reply to Benjamin Daeuber from comment #151) > > > > I had not considered that a bug. If you do let me know and I'll change > > > > that > > > > behavior. > > > > > > If I allow item > > > level holds for certain item types and then have a global preference > > > override that, it may be a problem. > > > > If I *disallowed* item level holds for a certain item type that should say. > > So, what I had forgotten and had to remind myself was those rules are not > meant for the staff side, only for the opac. It has nothing to do with this > enhancement. However, I've added a small followup that lets the librarian > know if a given item on a record would be forced to be an item level hold or > would be disallowed as an item level hold! It seems like a good datum for > the librarian to know. I see, Kyle. I was tripped up because the "Item Level Holds" dropdown is *not* enforced on the staff side, but the "Holds Per Record (count)" *is* enforced on the staff side. Either way, I do see the message now. I was thinking something more along the line of the yellow message box and an "Override" button after making the attempt, but I am of a mind with you and don't want to drag this farther. Do you feel that should be addressed later with another bug ticket? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
