https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17216
--- Comment #67 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #64) > Hi Jonathan, mostly good - please take a look: > > Administration > Authorized values > > 1) I think the 'virtual' authorized values branches, itemtypes and cn_sort > should not show up in the authorized value list in administration. It's not > a nice effect that it looks like you can add to them and then get an error > message - we should avoid that kind of user experience. Done, removed. > 2) Small typo when adding to 'branches'. Should be: > The authorized value categories 'branches', 'itemtypes' and 'cn_source' are > used internally by Koha and are not valid. Done, thanks. > 3) If you typo in an authorized value category, there is no way to remove > it. That can get annoying pretty fast. We should offer a way to delete an > empty authorized value category (maybe if not empty too?). Yes, it's in the TODO section of the commit msg. > 4) The new empty option in the pull down list leads to some confusing > display: > Authorized values for category : > There are no authorized values defined for Fixed, the empty one is no longer displayed. > Editing items > > 5) There is a problem with the STACK on 952$j as this doesn't exist. Should > we clean it up by removing it from the frameworks if there are no values > defined for it? I have not found regression with master. So let's deal with it on another bug report. > Authority types > 6) Should we add the same FK relationship there? (separate bug?) Yes, and others as well. But that should be done on another bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
