--- Comment #227 from Katrin Fischer <> ---
If this is an intended behaviour change - I am not in favor of it and it's
unusual to push things in like this without discussion.

I think we should not force staff to do a record level hold if they really want
to do an item level hold. For the OPAC, this might be debatable.

Also: I didn't have any other hold on that record when encountering this.

One scenario I can imagine for staff: Put a hold on the damaged item, that is
still out to the user, while waiting for the already ordered new item (assuming
th library is using AcqCreateItem with 'on receive' or 'cataloguing')

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
Koha-bugs mailing list
website :
git :
bugs :

Reply via email to