https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21774
--- Comment #10 from Marcel de Rooy <[email protected]> --- (In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #9) > I'm not sure no_split logic was the correct solution, so I have no issue > with this removal. However, I think they may be tried to use that to split > or not split based on the frameworkcode, because the field might not be > repeatable, and so it is a little larger than this change alone. Just my > thoughts on this. I could be off on a different tangent. Hi Mark, Split or not based on the frameworkcode or repeatableness of the subfield is imo an enhancement request; this was no part of earlier code. If feel it could be useful though. I could also think of having the option to use another separator than pipe. But they should imo be handled on a new report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
