https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21774
M. Tompsett <mtomp...@hotmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mtomp...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #12 from M. Tompsett <mtomp...@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #10)
> Split or not based on the frameworkcode or repeatableness of the subfield is
> imo an enhancement request; this was no part of earlier code.
It wasn't part of the earlier code, because they did no_split as a stop gap
measure to fix it. The fix that made it in was wrong. This wouldn't be an
enhancement, because it would actually be fixing the problem correctly.
I could sign this off, but then we haven't really solved the enforcing of
non-repeatables. Why do you think frameworkcode was passed before it was
removed in bug 19096? It is what would determine if it is repeatable, not the
default framework. This patch allows anything and all things to repeat. Perhaps
I'm reading the code wrong? *shrug*
> ... I could also think of having the option to use
> another separator than pipe. But they should imo be handled on a new report.
Pipe is already used as a separator in other places. I don't see a need for
separator flexibility. But yes, that would be a separate issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
