https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=17047
--- Comment #435 from Alex Arnaud <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #427) > Hi Paul, thx for replying! > > I've applied the patches and taken a look at the configuration page. What's > the difference between the 'no' and 'no, let me think about it'? Where is it > explained? I think as the system preference reads "Enable request to Mana > Webservice" this is not clear to the user that there is no communication > without the token. I would feel better if we left to "no". We can still > advertise Mana of course - I am not against the service at all, but I feel > we should be consistent and clear about protecting user's privacy. > > Noticing while testing: commmit messages are a bit messy and not following > guidelines (old patch, I know, but easy to fix). I even volunteer doing it :) Hello Katrin, It was a way to promote the feature (i say "it was" since we decided to remove this third option). "No, let me think about it" was the default choice, and, in this case, the user saw a message telling him he has not decided yet to use or not Mana. You can communicate with Mana if you did not set a token. You can retrieve subscriptions and reports but not share them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
