https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22508
--- Comment #31 from Hugo Agud <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #30) > In general I have my doubts on making these changes. It does not really fit > in with the original design. > Having a flag public to control OPAC access and a new public path could be a > bit confusing. > As you already noted, the public path should be added to the Tools/Upload > form too if we continue here. > Do we really want to copy the file? Another approach would be to grant > access via the Apache configuration. You would only need a URL config var. > Using that approach would make all files public. Or create a PUBLIC category > etc to keep a distinction between public and private? The original goal of this patch is to allow discoveries to access directly the files located at koha repository for full text indexing, it is not really a matter of public and private files, the perhaps the checkbox public here is not appropiate... just direct access? To be able to manage public and private files (just the file, not the records) is also a great functionality that koha could have that could be developed in another bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
