https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22728
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > As you said, it appears more like a lucky side effect, but hard to tell how > many libraries may be using it. Could we replace it with a proper > implementation? I think a 'mandatory' flag in the patron attribute > definition would make more sense. Why would it make more sense? I think that we should deal with them in the pref, as it is where we deal with mandatory fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
