https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=22728
--- Comment #11 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #8) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #6) > > As you said, it appears more like a lucky side effect, but hard to tell how > > many libraries may be using it. Could we replace it with a proper > > implementation? I think a 'mandatory' flag in the patron attribute > > definition would make more sense. > > Why would it make more sense? I think that we should deal with them in the > pref, as it is where we deal with mandatory fields. Because we already define if they show up, if they are repeatable etc. there. And it seemed easier. If we can find a way to autoamtically update Owen's modal with the descrpitions instead of the current naming scheme... that would be nice too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
