https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=7611
Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Signed Off |Failed QA --- Comment #25 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- > > Manually edited: > > Items available for loan: Centerville[Call number: 005.13/3] (1). > > Centerville Staff Collection[Call number: 005.13/3] (2), Centerville > > Ordered[Call number: 005.13/3] (1). Damaged (1). > > What do you mean about missing 'for reference'? From my perspective that is > a goal of the patch here - to remove that label and use the notforloan > descriptions - if a library wants items to appear that way then they can > make that the description of the authorized value for the opac. This way > those who want it can put it in place, and those who don't can provide their > own description But then we should also remove the "Items available for loan". Because that is clearly giving a wrong idea? Just: Items: ? Or we can still assume that items that are marked with any 'not for loan' value are for reference and list them with their individual status descriptions behind the "Items available for reference" label. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
