https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23875
--- Comment #9 from Ere Maijala <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #8) > Maybe we should have an unchangeable index for biblionumber then? The > sorting could quickly become an issue. People tend to search very 'broadly' > and then the tie breaker would come in quickly. At least that's what we see > with Zebra quite often with searches for single words and similar. Using non-numeric sort doesn't really matter for tie-breaker unless you care for the order. I'd actually like us to have a hard-coded biblionumber index field. One could also argue that biblionumber should only be the last resort, and publication date should be the primary. We'll probably end up making it configurable. ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
