https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23875
--- Comment #11 from Ere Maijala <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #10) > publication date can get quickly problematic for serials... the first date > in 008 is usually quite old. Every approach has its own problems ;) True, and I didn't mean to imply that should be a default. :) > Maybe we can move the discussion of adding a hardcoded biblionumber index > into another bug, but it really bugs me that the sorting of a clearly > numerical value would be alphabetic... it just seems very wrong. I've ended > up explaining the 'last resort' ordering a lot of times to libraries. I'm fine either way. But clearly at least a follow-up to this bug is needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
