https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8132
--- Comment #81 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- Hi Marcel, Thanks for taking a look at this. (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #79) > "If an item is the last one of a biblio that have biblio-level hold > placed on it, we should block the deletion." > > Well, this is quite arguable. Imo probably cleanup_database could remove > holds that make no sense like biblio level holds when there are no items. > The same commit says: > "Note that there is something a bit weird as we are blocking items > from a biblio that has biblio-level holds on it (not found), but we > do not blocking the deletion of an item with a waiting item-level hold." > > Lets not push inconsistency but resolve it? What do you suggest? I'd like to repeat that this bug is about preventing phantom holds, nothing else. I don't think we should fix other inconsistencies on this bug report (it has been considered critical during years...) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
