https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8132
--- Comment #85 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #84) > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #83) > > (In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #82) > > > (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #81) > > > > What do you suggest? > > > > > > Maybe we should stick to the scope that the title suggests. Do not delete > > > items with holds. Biblio level holds are out of scope. > > > > No, it's the main point of this bug report. > > > > We want to prevent deletion of the last item of a bibliographic record with > > a biblio-level hold on it. > > Sorry, I can't agree on that reading comments and patches. See comment 0: """ I don't think it always did this - but I tested today on 3.8 and it deleted an item and a bib record (cause I checked that box) that had holds on it. """ Then comment 1: """ This is how you end up with phantom holds that can never be deleted. """ And comment 20. I can confirm that I wrote those patches to prevent such deletion, and so phantom holds. That's why I rebuilt a bit the interface to display the why an item cannot be deleted, and so introduced the new "last_item_for_hold" error code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
