https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23849
Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #17 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- After reviewing in a local Koha all the sysprefs of the file "in_DB_but_not_shared" here are some notes. == Pretty sure they should be > No == Or just share if it's empty/default or custom. AdlibrisCoversURL EmailAddressForSuggestions ILS-DI:AuthorizedIPs NewItemsDefaultLocation OpacHiddenItems OpacHiddenItemsExceptions ReplyToDefault RestrictedPageLocalIPs RestrictedPageTitle ReturnpathDefault SelfCheckAllowByIPRanges UpdateItemLocationOnCheckin == Maybe false positive, could be yes (share) instead of no == OverDrivePasswordRequired OverDriveUsername NovelistSelectStaffEnabled NovelistSelectView OAI-PMH:AutoUpdateSets OAI-PMH:MaxCount opaclanguages OpacLocationOnDetail OPACResultsLibrary RESTOAuth2ClientCredentials SyndeticsAuthorNotes SyndeticsCoverImages SyndeticsCoverImageSize SyndeticsEditions SyndeticsExcerpt SyndeticsReviews SyndeticsSeries SyndeticsSummary SyndeticsTOC == We could just share if it's empty/default or custom == This list will be copied to bug 23898 AmazonAssocTag IntranetCirculationHomeHTML IntranetFavicon IntranetmainUserblock IntranetNav IntranetReportsHomeHTML IntranetSlipPrinterJS intranetstylesheet OpacCustomSearch OPACHoldsIfAvailableAtPickupExceptions OpacLoginInstructions OpacMainUserBlock OpacMoreSearches OPACResultsSidebar OPACSearchForTitleIn ProcessingFeeNote RestrictedPageContent RoutingListNote SpineLabelFormat XSLTDetailsDisplay == Not sure, does any know more about these sysprefs? == Can field lists be an issue? They might just be useless actually. Or we could just want to know if it's empty/default or custom. Precedent: NotesBlacklist is currently marked as > No AuthoritySeparator BibtexExportAdditionalFields ExportRemoveFields ISBD MarcFieldsToOrder MarcItemFieldsToOrder MergeReportFields OPACISBD PatronQuickAddFields RisExportAdditionalFields StatisticsFields SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedBatchmod SubfieldsToAllowForRestrictedEditing SubfieldsToUseWhenPrefill SubscriptionDuplicateDroppedInput Similar doubts as previous paragraph: ItemsDeniedRenewal LinkerOptions MARCAuthorityControlField008 UNIMARCAuthorityField100 Are backends lists an issue? Or is it actually very useful? ILLOpacbackends Could the directory name be private and thus not sharable? intranet_includes Could some codes be so rare that they are equivalent of sharing the library name? MARCOrgCode That should be ok right? borrowerRelationship BorrowersTitles == We might want to filter the content of these == To only get Koha's official fields and not custom DB fields. They could be ignored now and be in a follow up bug. Or we could just want to know if it's empty/default or custom. BorrowerMandatoryField BorrowerUnwantedField DefaultPatronSearchFields UniqueItemFields Filter to only have Koha's official statues: decreaseLoanHighHoldsIgnoreStatuses == prefs with > no == They could be ignored now and in a follow up bug, we could share if it's empty/default or custom. == Maybe a typo in the list == ArticleRequestsMandatoryFieldsItemsOnly ↓ ArticleRequestsMandatoryFieldsItemOnly OpacSuppressionByIPRangeµ ↓ OpacSuppressionByIPRange == Not in the UI (Administration › System preferences) what does it mean? == ElasticsearchIndexStatus_authorities ElasticsearchIndexStatus_biblios INTRAdidyoumean OPACdidyoumean OpacMainUserBlock printcirculationslips opacheader -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
