https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=23849
--- Comment #26 from Victor Grousset/tuxayo <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #25) > Victor, yes it's the correct file. I am sorry but those comments are hard to > read, you should apply the patches and provide patches on top. IMO that will > be more readable. Ok, I'll try to integrate the content of my comments via patches. I wasn't confident enough to change the patches (fear of "corrupting" your work) And I'm still wondering how to deal with the many "categories" that I needed to do in my long comment. Thought thanks to the responses from Katrin and you, now I don't need that many categories. > Basically the ones marked with "> No" are the ones I processed already, so > no need to talk more about them, unless you find something wrong (ie. marked > as No but should be shared, however I am pretty sure there is no error on > them). I'll double check my list of potential false positives. Because I included those not having a privacy risk. Because I'm much less competent about the usefulness. > Work to be done (on top of the patches/files): > 1. Identify the "Not sure" and give your opinion ok > [...] > 4. (optional) Do the same work for the new prefs added since I worked on > this (19.06.00.044 - f4254cca37) This is great, you got the exact version!! :D That's what I didn't know how to reliably find. > 5. Remove the "no" (and "not sure") and provide a patch for Hea. Thanks for the plan! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
