https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=13881
--- Comment #64 from Josef Moravec <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #63) > (In reply to Josef Moravec from comment #62) > > In a public library with three circulation desk, we had to set them as > > branches, as there was no other option in Koha... It's not big issue in > > relatively small public library. But when the library has more branches and > > more desks at each of them, the branches and desks combination could be more > > precise and semantically much more meaningful > > This is so interesting. I used to use the biggest public library in the > third biggest city (population 2.5 million) in Canada and it only had 1 area > for circulation. > > In Australia, I live in the biggest city (population 5 million) but all our > public libraries do seem to be small. Usually with 1 circulation area that > is mostly self checkout with 1 desk and 1 hold/reserve area. > > Having more desks seems like it would be more challenging from a management > perspective... but maybe it's necessary for bigger libraries in bigger > places? This is really interesting David! It looks like it does not depend on size of library but more on the attitude and customs of librariens ;) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
