https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #5 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- But in any case... I think there's a difference between the Koha 001 and 003... and the original 001 and 003. I think we abuse the 001 and 003 in Koha, and I'm not sure we should develop functionality to further entrench that abuse. But I would be interested in a table that tracks record imports better, so that it would be easier to find a local Koha identifier (ie biblionumber / 999$c) that was created during an import using the 001 and 003 (or OAI-PMH identifier and baseUrl). However, how likely is it for source MARC data to have the 001 and 003 properly filled out? Looks like import_biblios has a control_number field, but cleanup_database.pl deletes all the records from the import_* tables periodically, so that's not useful. Anyway, I'll stop spamming now. I think that I'm probably just being too idealistic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
