https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25603
--- Comment #10 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #8) > Hm, using ExtractValue is slow, especially on big databases. As Magnus says > in lot of use cases a quick access to 001 and 003 for matching is really > helpful. We have started to map the biblioitems.ean to 001 for use in > reports etc. as the 001 is so important to us. The column is indexed and not > mapped by default in MARC21 - but it remains a bit of a workaround and I'd > be happy about a real controlnumber column. Hmm, ok, I think I'm convinced. We're still living in a MARC centric world, so there's no reason not to add it. And I doubt Koha will ever use the 001 instead of the 999$c, so even if it isn't ideal from a MARC perspective, it does seem like a practical move. I know I hate using ExtractValue in databases in the hundreds of thousands or millions of records O_O. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
