https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29623
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Druart <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Martin Renvoize from comment #16) > Rephrasing my question.. why the choice to use Koha::Cache::Memory::Lite > instead of just Koha::Cache ? > I don't think the approach is bad at all, just trying to understand the > decisions made. Because of the flush :) We cannot flush using regex, so I had to flush the whole L1. See the last patch :) The last patch does it now, but only for L1. I guess I also wanted to prevent bad values to be kept in cache, but... we shouldn't be afraid of that, right? We certainly could improve this idea, but having it as simple as it is now seems good to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
