https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29963
--- Comment #25 from Alex Buckley <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Benjamin Daeuber from comment #24) > > > > Going forward if there are concerns with the original patch changing the > > behavior of one item form making it inconsistent with others in cataloguing > > and acq. Then I think, instead of a behavior change, it should be sufficient > > to add a hint saying that if you save the 952$d with nothing in it Koha will > > still auto-populate the 952$d with today's date. Perhaps this is the most > > straight forward solution? > > I'm not sure I agree with this. I don't really see an issue with being > context aware. Hints get missed with potentially far reaching consequences > in the case of a batch edit. Logical, context aware behavior seems more user > friendly. It makes sense to populate that field in the case of serials and > new items, but not in the case of item edits. I don't really find that to be > an inconsistent behavior. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this Benjamin. I think it could be helpful to get Katrin's thoughts on the best approach because as Martin noted in comment #18 she failed QA the original 29815 patch as it doesn't affect all data entries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
