https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=29963
--- Comment #29 from Alex Buckley <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #28) > I think there is 2 sides to this bug or even 2 separate bugs: > > 1) Handling in the item editor with the field being filled in > 2) Adding the dateeaccessioned on editing even when emptied out. > > 2) is actually this bug and was not caused by the pre-fill change, but bug > 23463: > Bug 29958 - Missing dateaccessioned is set to today when storing an item > > I believe we might want to treat them separately to not have things even > more confusing. Thank you Katrin, I agree. Also, to fix issue #1 that you describe I wonder if it would be best to do the following: 1. Upstream the patch reverting 29815 2. Then create a separate bug report to discuss whether the community prefers a context-specific pre-filling of the dateaccessioned or a hint. By proceeding with upstreaming the reversion at least we would fix the urgent bug without getting bogged down in the discussion. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
