https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33932
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Brannon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #8) > (In reply to Christopher Brannon from comment #0) > > Is there a reason we need to have multiple status fields? I'm wondering why > > we don't consolidate the statuses to a single field that you can set > > multiple statuses on. Is it because each status has a timestamp? > > I've re-read your description, and I'm wondering are you talking about a > screen that has a "Status" label and then a number of checkboxes for things > like "Withdrawn", "Damaged", "Lost", etc? I guess, if it helps to have it all separated out, then that isn't really the issue. It probably has more to do with how staff interact with it. IMO, as status is a status. I shouldn't have to look in 4 different places to address an item status. Maybe the way it is displayed in the item editing could be changed to checkboxes with a date next to each, and a single update button? That would seem a little less clunky. However, it still makes reporting more complicated - You simply need a status, and you are having to get information from multiple fields. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
