https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=33932
--- Comment #13 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Cook from comment #12) > (In reply to Katrin Fischer from comment #11) > > If we had only one status field, we'd have to prioritize the different > > status as only one would apply. So it can be either lost, or withdrawn, or > > not for loan, or damaged... only one thing applies at a time, leading to > > less exact reporting. > > I was thinking the same thing. While there might be more convenience, > there'd be less granularity. > > > But maybe I misunderstood and you only meant one calculated status or a > > display status and the other fields remain as they are? > > Not sure which "you" you mean here hehe. Christopher, but always good to check if one is talking about the same thing/idea :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
