https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=32980
--- Comment #13 from Julian Maurice <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Druart from comment #12) > Any good reasons to not use TestBuilder? I have some reasons... not sure if they're good enough: - I'm used to DBIx::Class API and always forget how to use TestBuilder, so it's faster for me to write it like that (okay that one is not that good, I'm just lazy). - TestBuilder populates all columns, which can make tests fail randomly. Without it I don't have to think about those cases. - TestBuilder is not really useful in a simple case like this IMO - While writing tests I like to commit transaction and explore the database to see what's going wrong. And it's a lot easier when it's not filled with "AI37AMe2_0aESHPuxgZVLAmwHXOohDl" in every column. I'm ok with your patch but I don't understand why you took the time to write it. Is it mandatory to use TestBuilder in test files ? What do we gain ? Certainly not speed because it now takes 40% more time for the test to complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
