https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25539
--- Comment #61 from M <[email protected]> --- I ran another test and it does seem to be the case somehow still. Original record in Koha has fields 866 and 942 (the latter is Koha metadata, including required item type). The imported record has both of these fields missing. Both of these fields have exact same overlay rules setup up, the field ID being the only different thing between them. I did a dirty patch to the script to copy over field 942 from found record for matching, and only that seems to help... Weird thing, it'd be nice if someone else could try to reproduce this situation, maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I can't seem to spot what's the difference either... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
