https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25539
--- Comment #62 from Katrin Fischer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to M from comment #61) > I ran another test and it does seem to be the case somehow still. Original > record in Koha has fields 866 and 942 (the latter is Koha metadata, > including required item type). The imported record has both of these fields > missing. Both of these fields have exact same overlay rules setup up, the > field ID being the only different thing between them. I did a dirty patch to > the script to copy over field 942 from found record for matching, and only > that seems to help... > > Weird thing, it'd be nice if someone else could try to reproduce this > situation, maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I can't seem to spot what's > the difference either... Could you post the rules from the database maybe? So we can make sure we set them up the same and it's not a display issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
