https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
--- Comment #9 from Lari Strand <[email protected]> --- In our case, we need to find out the biblio details for the deleted item so we can show these details for patrons in their lists of past loans/old issues. Without the itemnumber in the old_issues table finding out what the patron has previously loaned is impossible. We are not using opac as a patron interface, we have our own implementation, that uses this plugin to talk to the web interface: https://github.com/KohaSuomi/koha-plugin-rest-di If the biblio is also deleted, we can find the details from deletedbiblio-table. Maybe finding out biblio details based on the old_issues itemnumber might be interesting for statistical/reporting purposes as well. "Keeping an itemnumber in this table that does no longer exist is bad practice." We still have deleted-tables so I don't consider the data as non-existing. If we touch these old_-tables like this and destroy this archived data that can be linked still with deleted-tables, shouldn't we do the same to action_logs? I consider action_logs as an "archive" table just like old_issues or old_reserves (not sure if we do this already, though. Remove itemnumbers/biblionumbers from action_logs that are linked to deleted items/biblios?). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
