https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36101
paxed <pasi.kalli...@koha-suomi.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pasi.kalli...@koha-suomi.fi
--- Comment #15 from paxed <pasi.kalli...@koha-suomi.fi> ---
(In reply to Marcel de Rooy from comment #7)
> (In reply to Lari Strand from comment #0)
> > Unless there's a good reason for this data loss, the itemnumber should be
> > preserved in old_reserves after deleting an item.
>
> Please explain why there is a good reason to do so. Keeping an itemnumber in
> this table that does no longer exist is bad practice.
The items may not exist physically in the library, but the data certainly does
in the deleteditems/deletdbiblio/whatever tables.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
