https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=36569
--- Comment #6 from David Cook <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Andreas Jonsson from comment #5) > 1. I believe 30 is sufficient, although even smaller might be possible? I don't mind erring on the side of caution using 30. > 2. I think restricting to ascii makes sense for values that are only > accessed programatically although I don't know exactly much the overhead is > for utf8mb4. I think I follow. I just wanted to make sure that it was an intentional change. > 3. It should default to the general collation. But setting it explicitly > would not hurt. I don't believe the collation is very important for these > columns, though. Well, my point is that the kohastructure.sql and the database update are different. Regardless of the collation used, they need to be consistent/the same. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
