https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=25408

--- Comment #93 from Arthur Suzuki <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Victor Grousset/tuxayo from comment #90)
> > - Unnecessary changes are made e.g. $patron->borrowernumber
> > to $patron->id (correct me if I'm wrong here, please!)
> 
> Indeed, in bunch of lines that are already changed, it's a good opportunity
> to enforce terminology without adding more conflict possibilities. But here
> it's in lines that are not changed, so it's adding new conflicts
> possibilities with other submitted patches and when backporting.

I've fixed this in the latest version of the patch :)

> > - Some lines that have not been changed have been tidied and included
> 
> Yes, also that.

Also fixed :)

> > - Personally I'd prefer this to be unfolded in more commits
> > to ease the review process, with each having a short
> > explanation of why the changes are required:
> 
> At least having the full commit message list these points. Not sure about
> splitting the commit after the work is done. Maybe I missed the main point,
> but in this case the 3 changes look 95% likely to have been done together
> and not as iteration with a different logic on each step.
> That's a nice thing to keep in mind for other reviews or my own patches,
> thanks :)

I've added the relevant points to the commit message, next time I will try to
better split the commits.
I don't know if the patch can move to "Passed QA" or if further work is needed?
Thanks for the review anyway :)
Best,
Arthur

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/

Reply via email to