http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=8798
--- Comment #78 from Kyle M Hall <k...@bywatersolutions.com> --- I cannot agree more with this assertion. Koha scripts have often been too 'smart' for their own good ; ) Over time this has definitely improved with more and more logic getting pushed into the Modules. I'd say this is where most bugs come from. The bug in the generation of fines in fines.pl vs returns.pl comes to mind. I think a long term goal is to have each system preference checked only once in the code base for any given behavior. That way these types of bugs won't occur. But now I'm getting all pie-in-the-sky and going off topic at the same time! To summarize, in our ideal Koha, scripts just get a bunch of stuff and pass it to the template, without doing much else. > That depends on how one writes them. If we think of a "script" as most of > the time being a wrapper that gathers command-line parameters, then calls > one or more functions or methods that exist in the Koha namespace, those > functions can readily be included in the Test::More-based tests. > > In other words, we should encourage writing scripts in such a way that unit > tests of their core functionality can be easily written. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
