https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=21572
Emily Lamancusa (emlam) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|Failed QA |Needs Signoff --- Comment #39 from Emily Lamancusa (emlam) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Emily Lamancusa (emlam) from comment #38) > I didn't think about the use case where a > library might want to prevent checkout if there is a pending item-level hold > but not a pending record-level hold, but I agree that would be a sensible > behavior, and is worth adding a follow-up patch for - stay tuned! On second thought, I think it would make more sense to address that use case in a separate bug after all. I'm not sure any libraries would want bib-level holds to block checkouts if there are other items available, but I think some would want to block checkouts if there are no other items that could fill the hold, and that's a bigger patch that would be out of scope here. In theory I could make "pending" in this patchset refer to pending item-level holds only and leave the behavior of bib-level holds completely for a follow-up bug, but I'd rather not make any changes here that don't allow the existing behavior to be exactly perserved, since that kind of thing has held up this bug for 7 years already! I uploaded a revised patch to fix the error from comment 36, so setting this back to NSO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
