https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41535
--- Comment #4 from Arthur Suzuki <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mathieu Saby from comment #2) > Shouldn't the symmetrical relationship of 464 be 463? I get this impression > when reading > https://www.transition-bibliographique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ > B463_fre.pdf and > https://www.transition-bibliographique.fr/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/ > B464_fre.pdf that's a good point, about the marc fields, as soon as the parent record is the highest level parent record it can be 462. I don't think we use multiple level of bundles in Koha so, 462 seems fine to me. > Question may be off topic (and I suppose also applies to MARC21): all these > fields can exist independently of Koha's "bundle" function. They may be > present in records imported from Sudoc, BNF or other sources. Is Koha able > to differentiate between and handle the two cases differently (links created > in Koha <> links inherited from a source record)? About this, Koha bundle feature will creates or remove 46x with item and biblionumber (see other bugs in the dependency tree). As thoses are specificaly Koha's identifiers, I don't think other links from other sources would be impacted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
