https://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=41535
Gamo <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |In Discussion CC| |[email protected] | |om --- Comment #5 from Gamo <[email protected]> --- Hello, I allow to jump in this bz : I totally agree with Mathieu Saby for the relation between fields 463 and 464. However in the complete context of this bz, the 462 may be more relevant as the top level parent of a bundle group is the bundle itself which is not a bibliographical entity, but a material one (as it can be a box). I may be wrong, but in this bundle-type context, as we mix bibliographical resources and a non-bibliographical one, I think that the use of the 463 is overruled by the 462. Other possibility (that may be really niche in my opinion) is to include and set the possibility to have bundle of bundles in which case we would indeed have something like : Master Bundle in 462 Childs Bundles in 463 Resources of Childs Bundles in 464 This bundle of bundles scenario wasn't head-ahead thought and so it would lead to an evolution of this BZ before making it community-wise -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
